Like most people, I hate to spend money that I don't have to spend. So when I have a problem with my car, I first talk to my friends to see if they have had similar problems. Then I take their well meaning advice and try to determine if I should go to the mechanic. About three months ago, I was driving my wife's car when all of a sudden the fuel gauge went from full to empty less than three miles after I filled it up. First, I thought "hole in the gas tank." I stopped, turned off the car and determined that wasn't the case. Then I restarted the car. Full tank. What gives. Two days later my wife reports the same thing except now the fuel gauge is permanently on empty. So I talk to my buddies. Everything they tell me leads me to conclude that it is going to be a costly repair. Depressed and knowing that, when it comes to car repairs, I am over my head I speak to my mechanic. He tells me this is a common problem with my wife's car and that I can fix it by buying a $7 fuel additive. He was right. I should have asked him in the first place. Lesson learned.
Attorneys that practice in the injury field encounter the same problem with their clients. Many friends and family attempt to advise clients on the value of cases. Their advice can be based on what they feel is fair, what they heard on TV, or what happened to Aunt Bessie. (Aunt Bessie is that fabled person that stubbed her toe and got 72 bijillion gianormous dollars.) Although they are well meaning, they don't understand case valuation. More importantly, because you are their friend or family member, they look at it from a biased perspective. (Nothing wrong with that because they love you.) At the end of the day, in spite of what you read in the newspaper, hear on the radio, or see on TV, juries tend to be conservative in the values they award. In fact, in spite of what you hear about runaway jury verdicts, that is not the case. Asking for the sun, the moon and the stars is not going to get you anywhere. Having an attorney that does this work evaluate your case and present it in such a fashion that you get fair value in the current climate will. The value of your case will be decided on its merit.
Take care,
Rod
Most people that buy a car are so happy to have made the purchase that they don't want to think about what could happen if the car is determined to be a total loss in a wreck. Mistakenly, they believe that their insurance will cover it. After all that is why you carry liability coverage, collision coverage, and uninsured motorist property damage coverage, right? What many people fail to consider is will they have enough equity in their car to pay off their car loan in the case it is considered a total loss. You see, in most states, including Washington, you are only entitled to recover the value of your car, not what you owe the bank. What does that mean to you? Well, if you bought that 2008 Escalade for $60,000 plus 6 months ago, you may still owe the bank $55,000. Now, under one of the GM's Red Tag sales that Escalade sells for $49,000. In today's soft car market, you owe the bank $10,000 more than your car is worth. Not a pretty thought, is it? How do you protect against this? Simple. If you buy a new car, or in some cases, a relatively new used car, your insurance company can sell insurance coverage to cover the difference between what your car is worth and what you owe the bank (the GAP). The price is nominal. The peace of mind you derive from having this insurance, is immeasureable in value.Later, RodNothing in the Blog should be considered legal advice or to form an attorney client relationship. Readers with legal concerns should contact an attorney who can offer them advice geared toward their particular legal circumstance.
It sounds like an overwhelming task but it's not. If you have expenses related to an accident keep track of them. You are going to need it at a later date. That means keep receipts and records of expenses as they are incurred. If you pay for items with cash get a receipt. If you pay with a debit card or credit card, keep your statements and get a receipt. Some of the items you should keep track of include:
1: Your wage loss
2: Your out of pocket expenses
3. Your deductibles
4. Your mileage
5. Your medical expenses
6. Services provided
One of the components of your claim is the economic loss you have experienced. It always lends credibility to your claim if you have receipts for your expenses or have documented items, such as mileage expense, at the time the expenses are incurred. Some people roll their eyes when I tell them this, but let's put yourself in the shoes of the jury that will decide your case or the party against whom you are making the claim. They will not dispute your claim if they are based in fact and carry the aura of credibility. That's why accurate record keeping is necessary. It may save you from having to take your case to court.
Nothing in this Blog should be considered legal advice or to form an attorney client relationship. Legal cases often turn on specific facts. You would be well served to obtain the advice of an experienced attorney who can offer her/his advice that is tailored to your unique legal circumstance.
Forum Selection Clause “Sinks” Cruise Ship Claim
One of the problems with claims against cruise ships is that they are governed by forum selection clauses that identify the court in which claim must be filed in and the time
period within which a claim must be made. As a general rule, these contracts tend to require a claim for negligence to be filed within one year of the incident. In years past, cruise ships would identify a court that was out of state, typically Florida, as the forum in which a claim must be filed. Now that Seattlehas more cruise ship business, some cruise lines will designate a Washington court as the forum to address these claims. Jack Oltman, Bernice Oltman and Susan Oltman filed a lawsuit in the King County Superior Court (the state court) for damages associated with a gastrointestinal illness that Jack and Bernice contracted while on a Holland America cruise. Susan was not on the cruise, but filed a claim alleging loss of consortium which is a loss of the husband and wife relationship.
The cruise ticket, that was given to Jack and Bernice, provided that any suit had to be filed within one year of the time the claim arose and in the United States District Court for Western Washington (the federal court). The only exception to this filing requirement was that, if the federal court did not have authority to hear the matter, then, and only then, could it be heard in a state court.
Unfortunately, the Oltmans waited until the last minute to file their lawsuit. As a result, when they learned that Holland America was going to raise the contractual defense that they filed in the wrong court, it was too late to remedy the problem by filing a claim in the federal court. As a result, the trial judge dismissed all their claims. The Court of Appeals agreed with the trial judge. After losing in the Court of Appeals, the Oltmans asked the Washington Supreme Court to review their case. The Supreme Court agreed that the claims of Jack Oltman and Bernice Oltman should have been filed within one year in the federal court because they were contractually bound to do so. The court, however, did not believe this to be the case as to Jack’s wife, Susan. The court held that since she was not on the cruise and she was not a party to this contract, Mrs. Oltman had the right to independently assert her claim for loss of consortium in the state court, thus reinstating her claim.
Lessons learned. First, cruise ship cases are a unique breed of animal. Since claims against cruise ships usually require a party to sue in a particular court and within an abbreviated time, care should always be taken when examining a claim of this nature.
Second, if you suspect you have a claim, get in to see a lawyer early in the game. This assures that mistakes like the Oltmans’ are less likely to happen. It also assures that attorneys are able to conduct an investigation while witness memories are fresh and to advise you of steps that you may have to take to preserve your claim.
Nothing in this Blog should be considered legal advice or to form an attorney client relationship. The information provided is general in nature. Nothing can substitute for a consultation with a legal professional who can address your particular legal problem.
Although we know Gladys Knight had the Pips (sorry, I just couldn't resist that), we don't know if she 
had PIP coverage, also know as Personal Injury Protection coverage. This is one of the most affordable, yet overlooked products that are sold by your insurance agent.
Personal injury protection benefits, otherwise known as PIP, will cover medical expenses, wage loss, burial expenses and other expenses such as nursing care and domestic help while you recover from an injury sustained in a car accident. It will cover you and the members of your household without regard to whether you were at fault.
Many people feel PIP is either unnecessary because they have medical insurance or they think it is too expensive. Both of these beliefs are incorrect. PIP has become an increasingly important component of your insurance portfolio. One of the most overlooked benefits of PIP coverage is that you don't have to wrestle with co-pays, deductibles and provider limitations while you are recovering from a serious injury.
PIP also provides wage loss coverage. At a time where the majority of households are two-income households, wage protection has become increasingly important. Consider the financial hardship you would experience if one income was lost, even for a month. Furthermore, if you are involved in a serious accident, you may not be able to work for several months. If that happens, you may not only lose your medical coverage, have the loss of one income, and, without PIP coverage, not have the resources to pay for medical care or basic household needs.
There are different levels of PIP coverage available ranging from a $10,000.00 minimum and going up from there. The level of coverage available will vary depending on your insurance company, however, all insurance companies in Washington must offer the $10,000 minimum coverage. In deciding how much coverage to buy, make sure to ask about the wage loss component that accompanies your PIP coverage.Typically, a $10,000.00 PIP coverage will pay you the lesser of $200.00 per week or 85% of your weekly earnings up to $10,000.00. Since the wage benefit under the typical $10,000 PIP policy is inadequate for most people, you should consider PIP coverage that is greater than the $10,000.00 minimum.
In our practice we see many people who suffer severe injuries that take well over a year to resolve and which result in far greater than $10,000.00 in medical expenses and lost wages. Having more coverage does not cost that much more, but will provide you with peace of mind.
Remember that you are not required to have PIP coverage. Our legislature felt that PIP coverage was so important that it required your insurance company to offer it to you. If you do not want the coverage, you must reject it in writing. If you do not reject it in writing, the insurance company must add the coverage but can charge you for it.
Rod's Tips:
Whenever you are involved in an accident, always confirm the insurance coverages you have available. If it does not appear you have PIP coverage ask for proof that you signed a written rejection of coverage. If your insurance company cannot produce a written rejection, they must treat you as if you had PIP coverage at the time of the accident.
Keep in mind that when you are involved in a car accident, your health insurance coverage will pay only after you have exhausted your PIP coverage. The rule of thumb is to submit to PIP first and health insurance later. Nothing in this Blog should be considered legal advice or to form an attorney client relationship. The information provided is general in nature. Nothing can substitute for a consultation with a legal professional who can address your particular legal problem.
Making Injury and Insurance Law Understandable
Posts
